"Spiteful retaliation is not big and not clever"
This is a very specific review in response to you negative reviewing Zeta after he slashed Jonathan. It is not a general review of you or your work. We don't know each other but there is no place in Ethos for spiteful retaliation. There was a ceasefire and you kept firing rockets, Joanthan himself said he has 'become buds with Zeta and doesnt want him to lose 100 points'. Throwing an ill-informed negative review because of a misunderstanding isn't good Ethos behaviour and needs to be called out.
Review in question:
https://app.ethos.network/activity/review/190598/wrongful-attempt-to-slash-someone-with-85-of-zetas-positive-reviews-mentioning~
You don't know Zeta, you also don't seem to appreciate how active and engaged he's been within Ethos - that's probably because you haven't joined the discord yet as far as i can see. That's why he has so many Ethos reviews. Look at the people reviewing him. It's a who's who of active people. This isn't farming. These are people who have come to know Zeta from testnet and beyond and want to review and vouch for him. It's normal community behaviour.
On the slash, Zeta has apologised repeatedly, has spoken at length with the slashee and they've agreed to move on from a neutral stance. Reading through your comments of the slash, you're clearly upset with Ethos mechanics. Go and negatively review Ethos.
Kicking a man when he's already likely to lose 100 points for a mistake is spiteful behaviour and that needs to be called out.
I don't know if you think you're defending a friend who got slashed and just lashing out but your friend has literally agreed a truce and that's the line in the sand.
I have known Zeta a long time through various groups and he's been with me on Ethos since testnet. He calls a spade a spade and also is quick to call out bad actors - generally speaking this is what a good Ethos user should do. He got this one wrong, apologised and will take his licks with a -100 most likely.
