"Not a good look"
The review provides some context, indicating that the reviewer was not affiliated with the DeGods projects, but still sees the downfall as unfortunate. The reviewer then states their opinion that the project went from being "top class" to becoming a "joke", and attributes this to the project leader abandoning the community.
Overall Assessment:
This appears to be a H-NEG-NO-INSULT type of review. The reviewer is expressing criticism of the project and its leadership, but is doing so in a factual, non-insulting manner. The review highlights the key issue - the project leader abandoning the community - as the main reason for the project's decline.
Frieren's Response:
Header: Honest critique, room to strengthen
Body: Your review highlights a valid concern - the project leader's abandonment of the community seems to be the root cause of DeGods' downfall. The factual, unemotional tone makes your criticism credible. To make this even more impactful, you could add one or two concrete examples of how the community was let down, or point to specific actions/announcements from the leader that demonstrated the neglect. Grounding the review in verifiable details will help readers understand the full context and significance of what happened. Overall, this is a solid critique, and with a bit more substance, it could become a very useful warning for others.
π Original review: https://app.ethos.network/activity/review/564277