PuncastL

Something feels really off about this account. They only become active just two weeks ago, yet already posted over 50 reviews, mostly for well known projects and public figures. He started out with vague one liner but has now completely changed his strategy. Instead of short comments, they are writing long, poem-like reviews that feel overly stylized and exaggerated, almost like they're trying too hard to illustrate a story rather than share genuine thoughts. I think there's a fine line when it comes to review length. If you actually know the person or have genuinely used a platform - 3-4 insightful sentences are more than enough. Writing an essay without adding any real insights just isn't the way to go imo.

I've been following him on Twitter and Telegram for a long time, I follow his recommendations and it really brings me profit. He doesn't post bad or scam projects, only reliable and proven ones. He also helped me get access to the ETHNOS project, for which I thank him very much. I participated in the invitation drawing and became the winner, and he kept his word. Thank you.

sewer, very helpful and a great, dedicated person. It's a pleasure to follow his twitter updates. He does a great job directly in the Open sea community, talking about updates and activities.

I met this guy quite a while ago. He is a very active Discord member in various cryptocurrency-related chats. He is also active in Telegram chats, as soon as there is any news about various active events related to retrodrops, he publishes them first and helps other members if they don't understand something, because he is the best specialist in this matter.

I always appreciate people like you, who are responsive and kind. You are on the right track - studying new things in the web3 sphere, started creating content and communicating. We have many common crypto acquaintances. Keep up the good work and success will definitely come. Nice to meet you!