Denayza666

He is very good influencer, that work in crypto and showing his good results. He runs a Twitter account as well as a Telegram channel, also i really like that he runs his own YouTube channel, where he releases videos and talks in detail about crypto projects in a very clear and straightforward way and information he shares on his social media is very valuable and accessible. Aside from social media, he personally takes part in various crypto activities, hunts for airdrops, and he’s very good at this. Now im your subscriber, wish you the best!

He actively runs a YouTube channel and a Telegram community, consistently sharing clear, useful breakdowns of projects like Abstract, Paradex, Backpack, Linea, Monad.He communicates simply and honestly, without without any hype ,just real insights that help people navigate the ecosystem.I’d confidently recommend collaborating with him - reliable, proactive, and genuinely passionate about the space.

I accidentally found out about Denayza thanks to a very well-made YouTube video about the Opinion project. Then I subscribed to his Telegram channel, which also turned out to be quite useful. It ended up not as a review but as an advertisement 🤣, but hey, it is what it is.

We met in the chat of a small project, chatted for a while, and then followed each other on Twitter. I started following his posts and I liked his thoughts. I mainly observe his actions in the Solana, Monad, and Zama ecosystems and in the Opensea project. I'm glad that he honestly shares his thoughts and helps me see the situation from different angles

The tone here is quite negative and even insulting, with the use of "fucking psycho" and describing the person as having a "fire in his eyes." This type of harsh, personal language tends to weaken the credibility of the review. While the reviewer does mention crossing paths and meeting the person, there are no concrete details or examples provided to back up the strong claims. The review feels more like an emotional outburst than a balanced assessment. Classification: H-NEG-INSULT This would be classified as a human-written, negative review that contains direct insults and lacks specific, factual evidence to support the criticisms. Suggested Response: Header: Turn anger into signal Body: I understand this person's behavior really bothered you, and that deserves to be addressed. However, the insults make it easy for others to dismiss your review as just raw emotion. If you describe what actually happened - the specific incidents or actions that led to your distrust - your words will carry much more weight. You can keep the same overall verdict, but grounding it in concrete facts instead of labels. That kind of critical feedback is more likely to be remembered and respected, even after the initial anger fades. The key here is to acknowledge the reviewer's feelings, but guide them towards providing more objective, factual information to strengthen their case. Insults tend to undermine credibility, so redirecting them towards specific examples is important. 📝 Original review: https://app.ethos.network/activity/review/563952

I remember the first time I came across his content - it was a video about the Abstract project. I was immediately captivated by his unique approach to the material and his unique sense of humor. After that, I started following his work regularly and over time became an active participant in his community, often joining discussions and exchanging opinions in the comments under his videos. What particularly impresses me about him is the combination of two qualities: 1) He is always in touch with the audience and open to dialogue. 2) He is constantly looking for and exploring new projects in the crypto industry, demonstrating a genuine passion for his work

I met @Denayza666 about six months ago, and since then I’ve known him as a genuinely active and dedicated person in the Web3 community. He runs a solid Telegram community and a YouTube channel where he shares insights on retroactive opportunities and social growth — our interests aligned perfectly in these areas. I reached out to him for help with profile setup, and he really delivered — fast, clear, and with great taste. It’s obvious he understands how to build a strong digital presence. His follower count keeps growing, the community is active and engaged — he brings real value, not just “running a channel.” Definitely recommend connecting and collaborating with him!

I came across him not so long ago, and he quickly stood out as someone who actually does the work in Web3, instead of just talking about it. His posts are practical: farming results, point strategies, simple breakdowns of platforms, and clear steps that help newcomers understand where to start. It’s not hype or guessing — it’s what he personally tests and uses. He covers a lot of ground: early-stage platforms, point systems, retroactive angles, tools on Base and Solana, and different ways to grow through activity rather than luck. The way he explains things is straightforward, easy to follow, and focused on real actions rather than buzzwords. What I like most is consistency. He shows up every day, shares what he’s trying, and talks through his process openly. No drama, no inflated claims — just someone who’s exploring Web3 and helping others move with him. If you’re new to crypto or want to understand how to farm points, catch early opportunities, or simply learn by example, he’s definitely someone worth following. Solid, honest, and genuinely helpful.

Your review expresses strong feelings, and that's understandable given your experiences. However, the insults and labels make it harder for others to take your criticism seriously. If you focus on describing the specific behaviors that bothered you - the Twitter activity, the intense eyes, the encounters in projects - your message will come across as more credible and impactful. Stick to the facts of what happened, and explain why it matters, without resorting to personal attacks. That kind of honest, grounded feedback is harder to dismiss, even if it's negative. 📝 Original review: https://app.ethos.network/activity/review/563952