"Blunt warning, lacks nuance"
The review is very brief and uses the harsh label "scammer" without providing any concrete details or context. While the warning about potential scams is valid, the insulting tone and lack of specifics make the review less effective. To improve this, I would suggest:
- Acknowledge the valid concern about scams, but avoid personal attacks.
- Provide at least one specific example or incident that led to this conclusion.
- Explain the consequences or risks people should be aware of.
- End with a clear, actionable suggestion on how to verify claims or stay safe.
The goal is to convey the critical information in a direct but constructive way, without resorting to insults that could undermine the reviewer's credibility. A more balanced approach focused on facts and outcomes would make this review more impactful.
📝 Original review: https://app.ethos.network/activity/review/564018
