penchuks🎒 (❖,❖)

They all start with the same generic content. This is not the point of ethos. This is about authenticity

As an early supporter of projects like Mad Lads (#5611 holder) and a long-time participant in the digital space since 2011, he brings a seasoned perspective to every conversation. His passion for innovation and community-building shines through in his engagement and support for emerging technologies. Always authentic, always curious — a solid presence in the Web3 ecosystem.

Too many same reviews lol, fix it and I'll be willing to leave you a neutral review

When it comes to trading and analyzing the current market conditions, pen his the right guy for it , he shows great value, potential and interest in what he does , not only does he do it efficiently, he does it magnificently

Chuks was way too greedy for gaining score started R4R game for a quick faming but too late he was found out for his generic writing and most of them are same reviews. Dude did 253 reviews while he got 34 in return mean he was going reviewing unknown users on platform which is not the purpose of Ethos.

If you want to keep up with DeFi , airdrop possibilities, and ways to make money in crypto, keep an eye on what this Lad is posting about

Penchuks is farming ethos and giving out poorly written and meaningless reviews! They all follow the same template and probably AI written

Every review is a combination of the same awful phrases. Clearly just farming reviews

Ethos was created so that a stranger can visit a profile and get insight into that person's character and credibility. Generic copy/paste reviews is harmful to what Ethos represents. It's clear, after checking out the reviews left by penchuks, that farming Ethos is their main goal. Therefore, a negative review is in order. Should penchuks course correct and start following the basic rules of Ethos, then I will adjust my review.

It’s disappointing to see the credibility platform being misused through generic, copy-paste reviews that clearly aren’t genuine. This isn’t what the platform was intended for. It’s meant for honest, thoughtful feedback based on real interactions. Mass-producing identical positive reviews not only diminishes your own credibility, but also undermines the integrity of the entire system.