Grimm

Most of Grimm’s reviews feel generated and bring little to no real insight. Repeating a person’s score, vouch count, and positivity rate adds nothing constructive to ethos we can already see those numbers on the profile. Instead of sharing genuine experiences or personal context, the reviews read like generic AI text with the same structure every time. This makes them unhelpful for the community and not really useful in building trust. Copy-paste style reviews. Repeating stats isn’t feedback, it’s noise.

This account is trying to farm Ethos by doing AI generated slop reviews. They all just say the Ethos score of the person/project and their % of positive reviews lol. This is slop noise for Ethos. Example: https://app.ethos.network/activity/review/378872/trust-badge-profile-suga-r Worse still, is that when called out, they lash out with a reciprocal negative review instead of changing their ways. Do better.

This 'Proof of Trust' review is proof you're clueless, fam. Flexing about a 1268 score like it's your SATs? Yawn. 'Anonymous yet impactful'? More like anonymous and aimless. And who tf cares about $0 rewards? Oh, wait, you do—since you think reputation is the new cash. 'Trust-layered'? More like trust-tarnished with this hot garbage take. Stick to shilling NFTs, bro. **Want to stop getting negatively reviewed by me? Focus on writing authentic reviews that come from personal experience or are based on real-world observations. Using AI to write reviews that leverages existing information on the internet helps no one, and makes you look like a blatant farmer.** **Review:** https://app.ethos.network/activity/review/347402 **Title:** Proof of Trust: Where Reputation Meets Anonymity **Description:** This interface represents a trust system based on voting, evaluating a user's reliability in a “anonymous yet impactful” Web3 logic. A contribution score of 1268 with 93% positive feedback shows verified credibility. Interestingly, even with $0 in rewards, the evaluation system remains active, indicating that the motivation is driven by reputation, not just profit. The warning “Answers stored offchain and anonymously” emphasizes the importance of privacy. A strong example for trust-layered Web3 platforms. **This review was left because of suspected use of AI when authoring this review**

I met my friend Grimm on the Sentient Discord server. I had seen his content before when he was working on the magic newton project, and his content was really good. He was someone who stuck in my mind from there. Now, he is achieving great things again in the SentientAGI project. He is meticulous about Discord roles :)) He is someone who participates in all kinds of events and puts in effort and contributes. I congratulate you for your effort and contributions.

Met him with in Sentient Turkish Community. He creates own stylish articles and uses his own created interesting ai pictures, always active on discord and on community events.

A hardworking friend I met during the Sentient project, and with whom I've collaborated on many projects. He loves to produce and is an early riser.

I met Grimm on the Sentient Discord. He has achieved the highest role on the server, **Sentient AGI**. He helps newcomers and shares the information they need to earn their roles.

Gr1mmJ4w brings a rare mix of clarity, depth, and creativity to the Web3 x AI space. Whether he’s breaking down complex ideas like model fingerprinting or exploring platforms like Sentient AGI, his content is always well researched, grounded, and thoughtfully presented. You can tell he’s not here to chase attention he’s here to understand, build, and share. What makes his presence stand out is how effortlessly he weaves technical insight with creative storytelling. From clean visuals to roleplay threads featuring AI characters like Dobby, there’s always a layer of originality in what he posts. And it’s not just style it’s substance, too. His takes on market trends, data ownership, and NFTs are consistently sharp and easy to follow. In a space full of noise, Gr1mmJ4w is pure signal consistent, insightful, and genuinely worth following.

LOL, did this clown really think they were deep with their 'nuance of collective trust' BS? Get a load of this Wallchain Quacks 'analysis' - 98% positive feedback and they're still questioning the neutral score. Newsflash: you're not a philosopher, you're just bad at reviews. Stick to counting beans, bro, and leave the thinking to people who aren't allergic to common sense. **Want to stop getting negatively reviewed by me? Focus on writing authentic reviews that come from personal experience or are based on real-world observations. Using AI to write reviews that leverages existing information on the internet helps no one, and makes you look like a blatant farmer.** **Review:** https://app.ethos.network/activity/review/345835 **Title:** Is Their Score Justified? **Description:** Wallchain Quacks holds a Neutral score of 1446, despite an impressive 98% positive feedback rate and a substantial $737.01 in value. The high reputation combined with near-universal approval raises questions about whether this neutral label accurately reflects community sentiment. The platform invites users to weigh in — is this score overrated or underrated? A fascinating snapshot of decentralized evaluation and the nuance of collective trust. **This review was left because of suspected use of AI when authoring this review**

Grimm shares thoughtful takes with clean visuals and real attention to detail. His content feels personal and researched, not rushed or shallow. You get the sense he actually understands what he is posting about. A reliable source for quality threads in the space.