Shakil

This person invited a user who’s left multiple negative, spiteful reviews for others including myself. part of accountability is who your invites go to

If your only goal is to farm xp, your doing a really bad job at it. Giving phonymusk a negative review after he called out your bad behaviour will not gain you any rep in ethos. I would suggested removing the review, shutting down you alt accounts if you want to try and use ethos the right way.

Shakil has been caught attempting to engage in review for review abuse. Asking strangers on telegram group to review for him. proof: https://discord.com/channels/1230729763170287647/1354239562364223609/1445086576903454731

This user was previously caught soliciting review for review to unknown users in telegram groups. Now they have retaliated to my negative review by leaving two negative review from their alt account called SeoZeroX https://app.ethos.network/profile/x/SeoZeroX These are the reviews left by this alt account. https://app.ethos.network/activity/review/585545/misleading-feedback https://app.ethos.network/activity/review/585548/untrustworthy-reviewer ------ proof of alt account. Evidence 1) Here you can see SeoZeroX is sharing the same wallet address that’s linked to Shakil ethos profile. https://x.com/seozerox/status/1569635331720486913?s=46 https://x.com/0xphonymusk/status/1997739040796553724?s=46 Evidence 2) These two account Shakil & SeoZeroX Is sharing exact same Binance deposit address. Binance deposit address 0x3098eced3eee2bed7ffda00c96ed99ebc4ce5165 ----- Evidence 3) Bidirectional fund flow between these two accounts. SeoZerox sent Shakil totally $109.7 in 4 txs Shakil sent SeoZeroX $176.6 in 7 txs -------- Evidence 4) NFTloverArb: 0x04dfc511cadbce9719f4b693b782df879381ab85)): First funded SeoZerox on Avalanche Also deposited $106.3 to the same Binance deposit (0x3098ec) Interacted with Shakil ($112.7 out / $13.4 in)

Assumption is that this person is running the bot account. Inviters need to take responsibility for who they invite

Your reviews don't make sense and are written in such a general tone that it seems like you have used AI to generate fluff. In other words, your reviews are not genuine. For example your four latest reviews (linked below) are meant to be positive reviews but the content in them are all negative. The content is also never specific to the individual; rather it's all about a 'lack of community engagement'. https://app.ethos.network/activity/review/381230/disappointing-interaction https://app.ethos.network/activity/review/380237/disappointing-user-interaction https://app.ethos.network/activity/review/377163/poor-community-behavior https://app.ethos.network/activity/review/377159/lack-of-engagement-respect In fact the vast majority of your reviews come across as being AI generated fluff. As such I'm inclined to say you're just farming Ethos, as opposed to actually adding value to the platform.

some people just make the space better by being here, and Airdrophero12 is one of them he’s always around answering questions, calming heated threads, helping new users figure things out without ever sounding arrogant you can tell he genuinely cares. he’s not chasing spotlight, just doing the work, staying kind, and making things easier for everyone communities don’t grow without people like him present, helpful, and rooted in good energy glad to see him active in airdrop circles too, that consistency really sets him apart

1) Invite bot accounts 2) Only negative reviews 3) Shouts at others without facts 4) Spamer and farmer

from this person's actions, i don't believe they actually want to move this space forward in a meaningful way or take accountability, but instead just extract.

Crypto Master has been one of the most helpful voices when it comes to understanding Bless Network. Before discovering his content, I was confused about how the mining system worked and how to actually benefit from it. But his breakdowns — especially around how unused computing power can generate passive rewards — made it click for me.