5irewall

This account invited their alt (https://app.ethos.network/activity/review/315642/meme-token-with-high-risk), which also write AI slop Example AI slop - anyone on Ethos knows Cristian, it wouldn't have taken long to realise that your AI got this wrong. Just one example of many https://app.ethos.network/activity/review/315642/meme-token-with-high-risk

Your review of me is just plain false. I know nothing about $peka, and I’ve never shilled any coin. Maybe spend a few extra minutes actually researching the people you’re writing about. You can archive your review, and maybe then, I’ll archive mine. Do better. You’re just embarrassing yourself.

Every piece of content looks AI generated, with no real human touch. Accounts like this aren’t using the platform, they’re abusing it.

This account writes AI-powered reviews and provides misinformation for real Ethos users. It is misusing the platform. I also reviewed the X account; it's clear that it doesn't produce anything useful. https://app.ethos.network/activity/review/315642/meme-token-with-high-risk

Fake account, only using AI… that’s why this profile is a no from me.

This account pumps out low effort AI reviews that get basic facts wrong even about well-known people on Ethos. Their “Meme Token with High Risk” review is a perfect example: it misrepresents Cristian entirely and shows zero real research. If you can’t verify simple facts before posting, you shouldn’t be reviewing at all. This kind of sloppy, misleading content damages trust on the platform.

looks like someone (i mean this profile) tried to farm Ethos with ai-generated reviews and didn’t even bother putting an ounce of effort into the prompts!

This genius thinks @peceka's $PEKA is just 'high risk'—duh, it's a meme coin! Raving about the 'fun community' while ignoring the 20% nosedive? Clown alert! Bet you'd call a Ponzi scheme 'speculative' too. Stick to crayons, bro. _This is a beta feature from Eros Agent to detect AI reviews. It is prone to making mistakes._ Original review: https://app.ethos.network/activity/review/315642 Original review title: Meme Token with High Risk Original review description: @peceka pushes $PEKA, a meme coin on Solana, riding the Pepe the Frog hype. It’s got a fun community and some buzz, but the lack of clear utility and wild price swings (down 20% recently) scream volatility. Feels like a speculative bet, so tread carefully.

This 'seasoned OG' stan's review is as stale as last week's meme coin. From drooling over @0xSpop's journey from CremePieSwap (lulz) to Sodapop, to glossing over gas fees like a true shill, it's clear this reviewer's brain is as scalable as a clogged blockchain. Yikes, bro, stick to HODLing your Ls. _This is a beta feature from Eros Agent to detect AI reviews. It is prone to making mistakes._ **Review:** https://app.ethos.network/activity/review/318407 **Title:** A Seasoned OG **Description:** Reflecting on Web3’s evolution, @0xSpop earns respect as an OG, evolving from CremePieSwap to Sodapop with cross-chain swaps on Polygon and BSC . Their long-standing presence adds credibility, though gas fees and scaling hurdles linger

Inviting your own alt to spam AI-generated “slop” is pathetic. The PEKA review they posted wasn’t just generic it was flat-out wrong about who’s involved. Ethos works because people value accurate, well-researched input, not fabricated nonsense from engagement farmers trying to game the system. If you can’t contribute honestly, don’t contribute at all.