← Back to Home
Jesus Martinez
Jesus Martinez
Score: 1671
⚔️
Kalshi
Kalshi
Score: 1628

Kalshi Taking Advantage of Users & Changing Rules

Created: March 1, 2026 at 05:49 PMStatus: ACTIVE

Description

After the events today, I will be closing my Kalshi Account

The precedent set today, not honoring users & hurting a major market in its only possible outcome is gross

Prediction markets clearly need to be regulated, you can’t modify contracts as they go

For context: there was a market on when the Supreme Leader of Iran would be “out”

He ended up being deceased from a U.S. military strike during a broader campaign on their country

The only other time a “Supreme Leader” of Iran has left office is due to death, so pivoting last minute to not allowing death to me while advertising missiles & the markets odds

Seemed to me at the time to be taking advantage of his death news & many others

While I obviously would’ve preferred an outcome without death & would’ve hoped for a capture, reality is reality

It wasn’t a likely possibility and the way this market framed itself looked at face value like a market that would honor any outcome surrounding him being “out” as Supeme Leader of Iran

I could’ve gone to Polymarket & for slightly higher odds have gotten a full payout

Instead, now, many are either at base cost for a 40/60 risk or they’re at a loss from entering with later odds

Clearly, to me, platforms need clearer wording

If he’s “out as Supreme Leader” the wording suggests “out”

He’s not being assassinated Luigi Mangione style for prediction market odds, it was a formal military strike which many suspected would happen

I’m so disgusted I’m honestly put off from Prediction Markets for the near future at least

If it’s this easy to get away with not paying out a market, I can’t in good faith trust Kalshi & their futures contracts

You owe me $2,500+ & you owe many innocent, casual traders millions more

I hope this can move the space forward in a healthier and more transparent manner

Even if you didn’t “do death markets” as a last minute change,

It doesn’t hold up

If you offered a market on him being out of power, what else did you think people were betting on?

Would have you taken zero fees on this market without the immense amount of heat you’re currently getting?

If I bet on Oil prices going up on Monday, which is indirectly betting on War, is that a death market?

If I bet on Jimmy Carter not attending the Trump inauguration because he’s 90+ would you call that a death market?

Is a death market “dead by” or just anything relating to a person

How does this protect anyone but people that predicted incorrectly

Also, if you settle a market essentially the hour the conflict starts then how do you expect people to trade it

Did you think we have insider information on when this conflict would start?

I just don’t get why a platform the size of Kalshi would risk their reputation on such a large market, it seems like blatant disregard for users trust

I specifically chose to trade because of the volume caused by his possible departure & your post on the odds spiking

You chose to publicize it, knowing people would be trading it based on fresh news about the Israeli/US strikes

Do better

Comments (24)

I'd also like to add Kalshi publicized their odds shifting upward while the market was technically "closed" as he was deceased You can still find this on X. https://x.com/Kalshi/status/2027773190420718034
mikalaila
mikalaila
1800
Mar 1, 2026
dont think that it deserve slash, we have a lot of same situatioons on each prediction markets as poly, opinion and etc.. def (personally not like any prediction markets)
Aibra
Aibra
1782
Mar 1, 2026
I don't think they deserve the slash. Especially since a fair resolution was found.
Kitta
Kitta
1452
Mar 1, 2026
это спорные ситуции, но я считаю, что по этой части виновата платформа. Если есть какой либо третий исход то это должно быть оговорено или средства должны быть возвращены пользователям
Dude, you're betting on someone's death and complaining. That's fucked up.
So many people will lose their stake in a truly working, high-quality project that held the "controversial" rate. And all this while explaining it all. Very funny. I don't argue that changing the market context is not a good thing, but this bet is very controversial, and PolyMarket hasn't decided on many bets on it either. If everyone complained about bookmakers for incorrect odds or closing bets, especially controversial ones, they wouldn't exist. I will abstain from this vote but the bots will write "easy slash"
Publius
Publius
1808
Mar 1, 2026
I agree with many of the critiques here, but the fact is prior to this market (and the events of this weekend) that Kalshi has stated (in the fine print) that they do not do death markets. Are other markets indirectly death markets? Definitely Should they have been clearer with this market? Absolutely Should they have stopped marketing this particular market as reports appeared that the Ayatollah was reportedly dead? 100% Are they prioritizing fees at the expense of customers? Completely But they did not actually change the rules midstream, they just buried the key information As always, the fine print is far more important than the headlines.
jaqenhghar
jaqenhghar
1303
Mar 1, 2026
paralar kullanıcılara iade edilmeli
@kimo498
@kimo498
1263
Mar 2, 2026
Trust is paramount in prediction markets; if Kalshi can change its interpretation after the result, it undermines the entire principle. Clear rules and consistent regulations are the minimum users have a right to expect.
Sibentoxyz
Sibentoxyz
1564
Mar 2, 2026
From this, I have no hesitation in pressing the slash because death should not be used as a gamble.
Page 1 of 3