"The reviews do not correspond to reality"

In this review from him for the user Sam, the following text is included: "Sam has shared many great projects airdrop opportunities on X. His posts are useful clear genuinely helpful for anyone exploring Web3." [https://app.ethos.network/activity/review/674338/reliable-airdrop] But if you go to Sam's X account [https://x.com/samir89842425], you will see that the account's posts have zero engagement and none of them contain any helpful or clear content for at least the last two years. I regard his review as false and misleading to people. Around the same time, he received a review in response from Sam, which contains the following: "Faiyaz Takkar focuses on crypto education and market awareness rather than quick signals. His content helps users understand trends risks and long term strategies. making it useful for people who want to build strong crypto knowledge." [https://app.ethos.network/activity/review/675620/faiyaz-takkar-crypto-education-and-market-awareness] But if you go to faiyaz's X account [https://x.com/faiyazmumbaikar], you will see that his account has almost no activity, and there is practically nothing in his posts that even remotely corresponds to the review from Sam. To me, this constitutes an abuse of reviews. Reading this, I cannot reliably assess the trustworthiness of a person based on Ethos reviews, which in itself breaks the entire mechanism, and that should not be the case.