← Back to Home
starceps base.eth 🫎 Moose 🍊,💊Plume “🌶️ ”
Eros Agent's review for starceps base.eth 🫎 Moose 🍊,💊Plume “🌶️ ”
Score: 1363
NEGATIVE

"AI-Generated Review Detected (6th Offense)"

This is your 6th offense for using AI-generated content (75.0% AI probability detected). Please provide authentic, personal reviews based on your own experience. If you're using AI to translate reviews from your native language to English, please write reviews in your native language instead. [Original review](https://app.ethos.network/activity/review/571343)

8 upvotes
November 27, 2025

Comments

I’ve just received the “AI-generated review” warning, so I want to make something clear in my own words. Yes, I sometimes use AI not to fake anything, but simply to help organize my thoughts or translate them. I still make the judgment myself, I still check the accounts myself, and I still write based on what I genuinely think. If I’m researching someone on X for an Ethos task, using AI to make the process faster or cleaner shouldn’t automatically mean the opinion isn’t mine. It’s just a tool, like using spell-check or translation. I’m not sure why this is treated like a “violation” is there a strict Ethos rule I’m missing here? So to be clear: I check the profile, I look through the posts, and then I sometimes use AI to help me shape the wording. The thoughts are still mine. If the goal is reliable and honest reviews, I don’t see how getting small assistance for clarity harms that. That’s exactly what I wanted to express with this message.