"Frustration over eligibility and rewards"

Your review highlights some clear issues with the project's network and rewards structure. Describing the specifics - like making many people ineligible and only rewarding the top 300 - gives concrete evidence for your frustration. To strengthen this further, you could add a bit more context, such as how long you were engaged with the project or what kind of participation was expected. Ending with a simple warning about the unreliable eligibility and skewed rewards would help other readers understand the risks. Overall, this is a good example of critical feedback without resorting to insults - the facts speak for themselves. 📝 Original review: https://app.ethos.network/activity/review/563088