""fair" is the one word i would describe them"

i saw the decisions made around the early releases of gmdaostudio, mind the gap and plasticity specifically. There were decisions that weren't popular, but it sure as heck were fair. I for one, really liked that and that was the basis of the title of this post. other than that, i found how the token-gated gmdiscord was created was pretty unique. read here for context gmdao.medium.com/gm-7925b2d899e2 There was a quiz for each day for close to 100 days. This was before the period of twitter bots and AI so it was the right time period to have that kind of experiment. Having an idea is one thing, executing it is another. How the token distribution was executed was also great. If nothing else it was consistent. Years have passed, and i'm still in awe of how the initial gm.token were distributed. Anyway, "fair" and "consistent" would be the adjectives i would use to describe them. "immense respect" is what i would use to describe how i feel of them