"Research & Signal Quality"

gg_91 consistently shares research that is short enough to read but dense enough to act on. Each post comes with source links (team notes, docs, on-chain dashboards, or reputable coverage) and a clear thesis that separates what’s confirmed from what’s inferred. I especially appreciate the way assumptions are labeled and timelines are scoped so people know what to watch rather than blindly “hope.” When facts change, the thread is updated with a quick edit and a reason—no ego, just new data. That level of evidence and housekeeping reduces noise in the room and sets a higher bar for what counts as a “signal.“