← Back to Home
Hash §
maverick's review for Hash §
Score: 1331
NEGATIVE

"Writes negative reviews irresponsibly"

He posted a negative review on Cerebro citing that founder shouldn’t be responding over every “hateful” driven comments. Let’s get the facts straight, I simply pointed out the reality that NFTs aren’t the project and are a separate vehicle outside. Couple of reasons why i have had to put it out there: 1. Nobody forced anyone to mint or buy the NFTs, period. People need to take personal accountability. 2. How is it fair to negatively review a project simply because price action didn’t go the way some users wanted? 3. Moreover, this is *checks watch* week 2 of the NFTs and they’re somehow written off as dead already? I don’t respond to all hate comments. But those that are senseless and baseless, i do and i will. It’s not ego, it’s simply putting out the facts in place

24 upvotes
September 4, 2025

Comments

Hash §
Hash §
1331
Sep 4, 2025
Yoo Maverick, Im simply share my opinion about your socials management. And I still believe that your social management was poor. I don't care about the mint and the methodology used; in the review, I focus on your use of social media. I simply observe and give my opinion. Thanks for sharing your opinion, champ.
maverick
maverick
2024
Sep 4, 2025
Then you could have dmed me or written me a negative review? But attempting to fault a project for NFT price action is seriously wild, which was what I pointed out. I have no issues with them saying for e.g. product could have been better, customer support is terrible, btw. Maybe if those weren't your friends, it won't have colored your judgement. I don't understand why a founder cant defend their own project. I stand by my actions. You can have your pov and believe this is driven by "hate" or "ego", idc.