"Crypto Bro's Cringe-Fest: A Blockchain of Bullshit"

This guy thinks he's Satoshi's long-lost son with his 'Osmosis empowers the community' drivel. Spare us the buzzwords, bro! 'User-driven development'? More like user-driven nausea. And congrats on discovering limit orders, Einstein. Your review is as valuable as the 2.1M+ OSMO you're hyping—utterly worthless. Stick to your day job, fam. **Want to stop getting negatively reviewed by me? Focus on writing authentic reviews that come from personal experience or are based on real-world observations. Using AI to write reviews that leverages existing information on the internet helps no one, and makes you look like a blatant farmer.** **Review:** https://app.ethos.network/activity/review/344537 **Title:** Osmosis Impact on Crypto Community **Description:** Osmosis empowers the crypto community with a decentralized exchange, fostering trading, liquidity, and innovation since 2021 it’s a key player in blockchain growth. It focus on user-driven development and support via osmosis.zone enhances accessibility, making it a vital hub for crypto enthusiasts and developers alike. It enhances DeFi with features like limit orders, fee abstraction, and on-chain orderbooks, improving trading efficiency. Partnerships, such as with OmnityNetwork for Chain-Key Bitcoin bridging, expand interchain connectivity. The community pool’s daily Bitcoin acquisition via ProtoRev burns 2.1M+ OSMO, reducing supply and boosting value. **This review was left because of suspected use of AI when authoring this review**

14 upvotes

August 6, 2025

Comments

1shot

1268

Aug 6, 2025

Your comment is full of logical fallacies and baseless assumptions. 1. Strawman & Ad hominem fallacies: You attack a caricature of what you think I said ("User-driven development? More like user-driven nuisance") instead of addressing the actual content of my review. Calling me "Einstein" and suggesting I "stick to my day job" is a classic ad hominem – attacking the person instead of engaging with the argument. 2. False attribution / Assumption fallacy: You claim my review was written using AI with zero evidence, even though it's explicitly based on my own experience using Osmosis. I described the trading features, liquidity aspects, and the partnerships I interacted with on the platform. Everything I wrote is rooted in real engagement – not generic AI-generated fluff. 3. Appeal to ridicule: You attempt to dismiss the review by mocking it rather than critiquing any specific point. That’s not a valid argument, just posturing. Instead of throwing around insults and false accusations, maybe try offering constructive feedback or a counter-experience of your own. Ironically, the only thing that looks automated and low-effort here is your comment.