"farming profiles using ai and spread false accusations"

Critical Review of @uzaylilareth — A Pattern of Disruption, Deflection, and Distrust In decentralized communities like those built around Web3 and blockchain innovation, the strength of the ecosystem depends not only on the tools we build but also on the character and actions of the people who participate in it. As someone who has actively contributed to various projects and platforms with integrity and a desire to see the space evolve, I find it necessary to raise serious concerns regarding @uzaylilareth, a user whose behavior has repeatedly caused confusion, division, and mistrust within the communities I am part of. Over an extended period of observation and interaction, it has become clear that @uzaylilareth exhibits a troubling pattern of behavior that goes far beyond ordinary disagreement or debate. This is not a simple matter of differing opinions — which are healthy and welcome in any open system — but rather a consistent record of spreading misinformation, engaging in personal attacks, and targeting others with baseless accusations. --- 1. False Claims and Baseless Accusations One of the most concerning elements is the way this individual frequently accuses others of wrongdoing without evidence. Whether it’s calling someone a scammer, questioning someone’s integrity, or implying manipulation where none exists, @uzaylilareth tends to throw serious accusations without offering any verifiable proof. This approach not only damages the reputations of innocent people but also distracts from the real issues facing Web3. Communities should focus on innovation, accountability, and progress — not on defending themselves against empty slander. His accusations appear more about creating noise and confusion than actually seeking truth or resolution. --- 2. Escalating Conflicts Instead of Solving Them Rather than using disagreements as a chance to engage constructively or find common ground, @uzaylilareth routinely escalates tensions, often through sarcasm, provocation, and emotional language that borders on harassment. In multiple threads and public spaces, he can be seen attacking others, twisting words, and intentionally misunderstanding others’ points in order to stir more conflict. This behavior is toxic and damaging to community cohesion. People who come to contribute are often pushed away by this level of hostility. Even when approached with calm or facts, he often doubles down with more emotional reactions, rather than meaningful dialogue. --- 3. Attempts to Discredit Legitimate Contributors @uzaylilareth has openly accused respected contributors of being “dictators,” “thieves,” or “liars”, without anything concrete to back these claims. In one specific situation, he publicly accused someone of stealing or buying their account — based solely on speculation related to X (formerly Twitter) handle changes and validator identities. Such claims, presented without context or evidence, are deeply irresponsible and harmful. They undermine months (or even years) of effort that many community members have put into building their reputation and trust. Making wild accusations in a public forum doesn’t make someone brave — it makes them reckless. --- 4. Creating Confusion with Multiple Identities There has also been confusion caused by his own use of multiple X/Twitter identities, followed by attempts to shift blame onto others or the system. In his case, switching between usernames or claiming account complications has led to inconsistencies and misunderstandings — which he then blames on platform flaws or personal targeting. Rather than taking responsibility or communicating clearly with moderation teams, he often chooses to publicly lash out, accusing systems or individuals of censorship and bias, even when it’s clear the issue stems from his own behavior or mismanagement. --- 5. Abusing Decentralized Tools and Playing the Victim Perhaps most frustrating is how he frames any form of moderation or accountability as "dictatorship" — misusing the ethos of decentralization to justify disruptive behavior. Yes, Web3 should be open and censorship-resistant. But it should also be responsible. If you abuse tools, spam systems, or harass people, you will be subject to consequences. That is not oppression; it is community moderation. Instead of reflecting on his actions, @uzaylilareth plays the victim, framing every warning or ban as unjust, even when there is a clear violation of platform norms. This manipulative tactic is all too common in bad actors who seek to derail systems by pretending to be martyrs for free speech. --- Conclusion: A Pattern to Be Aware Of In conclusion, I believe @uzaylilareth is not contributing positively to the Web3 ecosystem. His pattern of lies, deflection, and aggressive behavior makes collaboration difficult, wastes valuable community time, and spreads unnecessary fear and division. I do not write this review lightly, nor do I enjoy criticizing others in public. But in decentralized environments, where we lack centralized protections or gatekeepers, reputation and behavior are everything. And if we don’t call out disruptive behavior in an honest, fact-based way, we allow it to fester and harm others. I hope he chooses to reflect, change, and rejoin the community in a respectful, constructive way. But until then, I strongly recommend others to approach any interaction with caution, question any claim made without evidence, and focus on building with those who respect the values that make Web3 worth fighting for. — A concerned and active member of the ecosystem.

Dude, you're still using Grok ai . Hahaha you're really funny.

@uzaylilareth Hakkında Eleştirel İnceleme — Sürekli Sorun Yaratan, Suçlayan ve Güven Zedeleyen Bir Profil Web3 ve blokzinciri inovasyonu etrafında şekillenen merkeziyetsiz topluluklarda, ekosistemin gücü yalnızca inşa edilen teknolojilerden değil, aynı zamanda bu alanlara katılan bireylerin karakteri ve davranışlarından da kaynaklanır. Uzun süredir bu topluluklarda yapıcı şekilde yer alan biri olarak, @uzaylilareth adlı kullanıcının davranışları hakkında ciddi endişelerimi paylaşmak zorundayım. Çünkü bu kişinin hareketleri, sürekli olarak topluluklarda karışıklık, bölünme ve güvensizlik yaratmaktadır. Gözlemlediğim ve zaman zaman doğrudan deneyimlediğim üzere, @uzaylilareth’in sergilediği davranışlar, sıradan görüş ayrılıklarını aşan ve topluluk yapısına doğrudan zarar veren bir örüntü göstermektedir. Bu kişi yalnızca farklı düşünmüyor; aynı zamanda sürekli olarak yanlış bilgi yaymakta, kişisel saldırılar yapmakta ve başkalarına hiçbir kanıt sunmadan ciddi ithamlarda bulunmaktadır. --- 1. Asılsız İddialar ve Suçlamalar En dikkat çekici sorunlardan biri, bu kişinin sık sık başkalarına dair temelsiz suçlamalarda bulunmasıdır. Birini dolandırıcılıkla itham etmek, başkasının hesabını çalıntı veya satın alınmış ilan etmek gibi ciddi iddiaları, herhangi bir kanıt göstermeden ortaya atmaktadır. Bu tür söylemler sadece kişilerin itibarına zarar vermekle kalmaz, aynı zamanda topluluğun gerçek sorunlara odaklanmasını da engeller. Bu tür saldırılar, tartışma ortamını bulandırmak ve dikkat dağıtmak dışında bir şey sağlamamaktadır. --- 2. Diyalog Yerine Gerginlik Yaratan Tutum @uzaylilareth, fikir ayrılıklarını yapıcı bir şekilde değerlendirmek yerine, genellikle konuları kışkırtıcı, alaycı ve agresif bir dile taşıyarak daha da gergin hâle getirmektedir. Birçok platformda, bu kişinin diğer kullanıcılarla alay ettiği, yanlış yorumladığı veya kasıtlı olarak tartışmaları körüklediği görülmüştür. Bu tarz bir yaklaşım, topluluk uyumuna zarar verir. Pek çok kişi katkı sunmak isterken bu düşmanca ortam yüzünden geri çekilmektedir. Bilgiyle ya da sakinlikle yaklaşılsa dahi, @uzaylilareth çoğu zaman daha fazla duygusal tepki vererek iletişimi zorlaştırmaktadır. --- 3. Güvenilir Katılımcıları İtibarsızlaştırma Girişimleri Bu kullanıcı, zaman zaman saygın katkı sağlayıcıları “diktatör”, “dolandırıcı” veya “yalancı” gibi sıfatlarla itham etmekte, bunu da herhangi bir geçerli veri veya belge sunmadan yapmaktadır. Örneğin, X (eski Twitter) kullanıcı adlarının değişimi üzerinden birinin hesabını satın aldığı ya da çaldığı yönünde asılsız iddialarda bulunmuştur. Böyle ciddi iddialar, bu ekosistemde güvenle hareket eden kişilerin aylarca, hatta yıllarca inşa ettiği itibara zarar vermekte ve tamamen spekülasyon üzerine kuruludur. --- 4. Kimlik Karışıklığı ve Sorumluluktan Kaçış @uzaylilareth, zaman zaman birden fazla X hesabı veya kullanıcı adı kullanmış, ardından oluşan karışıklıkları başkalarına ya da sistem hatalarına yüklemeye çalışmıştır. Özellikle kullanıcı adlarını değiştirme sürecinde yaşanan kafa karışıklığını kendisi açıklamak yerine, sistemin ya da kişilerin kasıtlı olarak kendisini hedef aldığını iddia etmiştir. Ancak burada açıkça görülmektedir ki bu karışıklıklar, kullanıcının kendi hareketlerinden kaynaklanmakta; buna rağmen herhangi bir sorumluluk üstlenmek yerine suçlama yoluna gitmektedir. --- 5. Merkeziyetsizliği Kötüye Kullanma ve Mağdur Rolü En rahatsız edici durumlardan biri ise, bu kişinin herhangi bir uyarı ya da kısıtlama karşısında "diktatörlük", "sansür" gibi kavramlarla mağdur rolü oynamasıdır. Evet, Web3 açık ve sansüre dirençli sistemler üzerine kuruludur. Ancak bu durum, kimsenin sistemi kötüye kullanmasına, diğerlerini taciz etmesine veya sürekli yalan yaymasına zemin oluşturmaz. Platformları spamlemek ya da tehdit etmek, merkeziyetsizliğin bir parçası değildir — topluluk kurallarının ihlali anlamına gelir. Buna rağmen, her yaptırım karşısında bu kişi kendisini mağdur gibi sunmakta ve dikkatleri kendi davranışlarından uzaklaştırmaya çalışmaktadır. --- Sonuç: Dikkat Edilmesi Gereken Bir Davranış Deseni Sonuç olarak, @uzaylilareth’in Web3 ekosistemine olumlu katkı sunduğunu düşünmüyorum. Sergilediği davranışlar; yapıcılıktan uzak, kırıcı, güven zedeleyici ve zamanla topluluğun sağlıklı gelişimine zarar veren bir profil çizmesine yol açmaktadır. Bu değerlendirmeyi keyif alarak yapmıyorum; ancak merkeziyetsiz yapılarda, kuralların uygulanması topluluk üyelerinin sorumluluğundadır. Ve davranışlara dayalı eleştirileri açık ve net şekilde ifade etmek, bu ortamların gelişmesi açısından önemlidir. Umarım bu kullanıcı tutumunu gözden geçirir ve daha sağlıklı, yapıcı bir şekilde yeniden topluluğa katılır. Ancak o zamana kadar, bu kişiyle etkileşime geçerken dikkatli olmanızı, söylenenleri sorgulamanızı ve sadece kanıtla desteklenen bilgilere güvenmenizi tavsiye ederim. — Ekosistemin aktif ve sorumlu bir üyesi.

First of all, I apologize to Serpin for the misunderstanding. (The review should be edited.) This is not about backing down or groveling. I have to make some observations. This will be a long message. First, from the moment I noticed Ethos, I felt excited. I wanted to use, try, and test it. And for that, I pressed all the buttons, as I do in all projects. While I had no malicious intent, I might have pressed the wrong button. The issue is related to EthosAgent. From the moment I noticed it, I wanted to use it; I liked it. My intention was not to abuse it, and I still don’t understand what “abuse” means in this context. Later, I realized that with the “validate” or “save” command—I’m not sure which—side commands like “neutral” or “positive” could also be used. But I think the issue was that while trying to validate or save a post under X, my name appeared as a response to that post. As a result, it looked like I was giving myself a positive score, but I’m still not sure. Anyway, EthosAgent wrote on Ethos that I was abusing the system, but I didn’t understand what they meant. I couldn’t find clear enough content to explain it. Then one day, Serpin commented on X. They had banned me; I couldn’t use EthosAgent. The reason? Even if I had abused it (which I still don’t accept in any way, as that wasn’t my intention), I later had to change my X name for another project. Actually, I had to revert to my old name. I had entered Ethos with the new name, but then I went back to my old name. Then I noticed I could use EthosAgent again. I started using it. Now, it turns out we have a limit of 5 actions per hour, and EthosAgent was warning me about this—thank you to them. Later, I realized that even though it was the same X account, my old and new names (the one I registered with Ethos and the one I reverted to) appeared separately in the validator panel. I think this is a bug. I was planning to write to Serpin about this when they commented on an X post. They expressed a negative opinion and wrote that they had banned me. On top of that, someone unfairly labeled me, saying, “CZ is following me, it’s a scam account or a stolen/purchased one.” That was slander. Serpin also seemed to take a stance in that direction or acted accordingly. I was wronged. So, I wrote a review about Serpin on Ethos. I should have put a question mark there because maybe Serpin is a very good person, but their behavior—banning me without listening or understanding… I titled it “dictator and centralized structure.” Yes, I was angry; I was wronged and slandered, and I was fuming. Anyway, they probably banned me from X after that. I went to Discord and said I wanted to talk to them and their partner. Their partner said they had one second, or they’d ban me, and refused to talk. Then someone else came—apparently their employee—and I refused to talk to them because the issue was between me, Serpin, and their partner, meaning I needed to speak with someone higher up in the project. Anyway, they banned me unfairly. Then this person named Doğacan, along with one or several friends, organized people against me unfairly because of the negative comment I made. These people are mostly outcasts and malicious individuals in the Turkish community, dirty people. I don’t know Doğacan, and I don’t know if he’s like that, but I think those who provoked him by feeding him information are like that. I will continue my fight until my last drop of blood because I am right. There may be points where I’m wrong or made mistakes—I’m human, I can make mistakes. I accept them and apologize, but I will also continue to fight against lies and slander. I’ll post this message on the main post as well so everyone can read it. My goal is to use Ethos and EthosAgent properly. I’ve been in this industry since 2012. At the end of 2012, I received an airdrop from Ripple because I was a beta user. There was RippleTrade back then, and Jed McCaleb gave me 10,000 XRP. Only 2,000 people worldwide received it, and I was the only one from Turkey. Getting an airdrop, making efforts in that direction—it’s not shameful, sinful, or wrong. I love testing, trying, and using new projects. As I said, sometimes pressing the wrong buttons is part of the process. In conclusion, I’ll say this: I don’t take this “slash” or this person (Doğacan and their supporters) seriously. But there are respectable people among them who have simply believed these lies and slanders. I still believe Serpin is a person of good character. They say you test gold with fire and a woman with gold. Some people in this industry are like women—they sell themselves for a few pennies. Those who understand will understand, and those who take it personally can take it. I will continue my righteous fight, and in the end, I and noble people like me will stand tall. My advice to Serpin: Remove the ban system from EthosAgent. Banning doesn’t get EthosAgent anywhere. Write code to prevent abuse. Right now, having two names in the panel is a bug—both belong to the same X account. Merge them. Let everyone use the system fairly. I think we share the same view: we’re against dictatorship and centralized structures. We’re against miner mafias in Ethereum. Let Hyperliquid be our example—community first. No VCs, influencers, etc. Greetings to honest people, and thanks to everyone, especially those who support me, the fair ones, the brave, and the honest. I’ll always be on-chain, but some will remain off-chain. Respect and love to everyone. Sometimes someone comes along and lights the fire, like the Olympic flame. Let the torch always be in our hands.